Liberalism in International Political Economy Compared with Marxism Research Paper

Liberalism in International Political Economy Comp bed with Marxism and Realism - Research Paper ExampleLiberalism and Marxism (and Gramscianism) In the theory of Liberalism, Adam Smith is one of its well-known proponents. His ideas on liberal capitalism focus more on how behaviors and market competitions are controlled by the invisible hand, believing that merchants or individuals are relying on their own in contributing greatly to economic improvement without the need for the intervention of the government.4Also, the collective individual initiatives are just as grand as the contribution of each individual, because morality done on a personal level and through the perspective of others is important in order to avow order and peace under liberalism.5 In essence, under the theory of Liberalism, there is an assumption of having similar thoughts and ideas among people, which makes it easier to assess whether an individuals actions will benefit others or not. ...This, in turn, will i ncrease the akinlihood that people will start thinking similarly, making it easier to govern them.6 Also, there will be no variety because everyone is experiencing similar circumstances, and unless there are problems in the ruling body itself, under Marxism there will be peace, equality, emancipation, and justice because people share the same ideas and beliefs like in Liberalism.7 Liberalism and Marxism may share some similarities such as the importance of equality, but these two theories differ in other aspects. For example, the core belief of Liberalism is that markets defend power over economic growth but does not increase the gaps between various social and economic classes because of morality. However, this is contested by Marxism ideas, saying that duration everyone may acquire benefit from participating in hand and commerce, the equality of gains will not be absolute among all parties. Because of this, there can be the unequal statistical distribution of wealth, with mer chants gaining more wealth over members of the market or the consumers as the result of differing relative gains for the merchants and the consumers.8More often than not if there is the unequal distribution of commodities there is also an unequal distribution of wealth, and vice-versa. Also, Liberalism is highly-idealistic in terms of giving importance to morality, and the fact that the margin between the rich and the poor are not decreased this means that Liberalism does not function as it is supposed to because not all participants in commerce regularly engage in fair trade and fair markets.